The historiography of Indian anti-colonial resistance has long privileged elite nationalism and large-scale revolts such as the Revolt of 1857 as foundational moments in the struggle against British rule. This teleological narrative has systematically marginalized earlier frontier insurgencies, particularly those led by tribal communities. Among these neglected episodes, the rebellion of Tilka Majhi in the Rajmahal Hills during the late eighteenth century constitutes one of the earliest organized armed resistances against the expanding authority of the British East India Company. This article re-examines Tilka Majhi’s movement within the frameworks of subaltern studies, frontier theory, environmental history, and colonial political economy. It argues that the rebellion was neither a spontaneous tribal disturbance nor a pre-political eruption, but rather a structured assertion of indigenous sovereignty, ecological autonomy, and moral economy. By analyzing colonial archival records, district reports, oral traditions, and modern historiographical interpretations, the study reconstructs Tilka Majhi’s rebellion as a coherent political response to fiscal militarization, territorial encroachment, and administrative coercion. The findings demonstrate that frontier resistance in eighteenth-century eastern India articulated an autonomous political consciousness that predated organized nationalism. Reassessing Tilka Majhi’s revolutionary role contributes to decentralizing nationalist historiography and recognizing tribal insurgency as foundational to the longue durée of Indian anti-colonial struggle.
BOURI et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: