Short Abstract This paper presents a hierarchical reinterpretation of the Solar System based on the Dual Mass Flow (DMF) cosmology and the BFSSU (Black Hole Fractal Steady‑State Universe) framework. Rather than treating the Sun, Jupiter, Earth, and Mars as independent outcomes of stochastic initial conditions, this study positions them as distinct branching states emerging from DMF‑driven flow structures and phase transitions.In this framework, gravity is redefined not as an intrinsic attractive force but as an effective spatial constraint arising from non‑uniform DMF flow. Stellar and planetary formation are interpreted as outcomes of DMF vortex stability, critical thresholds, and long‑term flow persistence.The Sun is identified as the highest‑stability DMF node within the Solar System, Jupiter as a sub‑stellar branching state, Earth as a stable planetary phase, and Mars as a case of early DMF decoupling. This unified interpretation explains why the Solar System exhibits a structured sequence of stellar, giant‑planet, active‑planet, and inactive‑planet states.Furthermore, the shared orbital plane and long‑term dynamical stability of the Solar System are interpreted as consequences of DMF vortex geometry and the formation of a stable DMF “flow plane.”This study provides a coherent, non‑competitive complement to existing astrophysical models, offering a generative principle for understanding Solar System structure within a broader hierarchical cosmological context. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1530-4234 Japanese Abstract 本論文は、Dual Mass Flow(DMF)宇宙論および BFSSU(階層定常宇宙)モデルに基づき、太陽系天体を「結果」ではなく「生成プロセスの分岐構造」として再解釈する枠組みを提示する。重力を DMF 流動によって形成される空間的拘束効果として捉え直すことで、恒星・巨大惑星・活動惑星・非活動惑星が同一原理から連続的に分岐する階層構造として理解される。太陽は太陽系における最上位の DMF 定常渦、木星は恒星相に近い準恒星的分岐状態、地球は安定惑星相、火星は DMF 結合が早期に弱まった分岐例として位置づけられる。また、太陽系の同一平面公転構造や長期安定性は、DMF 渦の幾何学的性質と安定面形成によって説明される。本研究は既存の天体物理モデルを否定するものではなく、それらを生成原理の観点から補完し、太陽系構造を階層宇宙論の一例として統一的に理解するための新たな視座を提供する。
Takafumi Matsuoka (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: