Possibilities of Artificial Intelligence in Sports Refereeing: An Exploratory Study Contrasting the Literature Review with Expert-Perceived Opportunities

Sports have progressively incorporated technological advances, yet while the impact on performance and broadcasting is remarkable, the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in sports refereeing appears residual. A closer examination of prior research suggests that this limited development reflects deeper conceptual patterns within the field. While existing research on AI in sports officiating has predominantly conceptualized the field under an accuracy-optimization paradigm (focusing on decision precision, visual attention patterns, referee fatigue, and performance enhancement), there is a systematic lack of theoretical and empirical work that frames officiating as a broader socio-technical ecosystem. In particular, the literature does not provide conceptual models addressing (i) AI-assisted risk prevention and athlete safety as a core officiating function, (ii) human–AI task redistribution in cognitively overloaded and hybrid evaluative environments (e.g., disciplines such as artistic gymnastics or bodybuilding, where technical execution and aesthetic judgment are simultaneously assessed), and (iii) the redefinition of the referee’s role when AI operates as an anticipatory or real-time alert system rather than merely as a post hoc verification tool. Thus, the gap is not only one of application but of knowledge production: the dominant paradigm optimizes decision accuracy, yet it leaves the question of how AI can transform refereeing responsibilities, cognitive load distribution, and safety governance within competitive ecosystems under-theorized. This exploratory study adopts a Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) perspective to contrast existing initiatives with the practical expectations of professional referees. The methodology comprises two pillars: a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines and qualitative experimentation involving professional referees using focus groups and affinity diagrams techniques. From an initial total of 1251 records retrieved across five academic databases (2019–2025), 1122 articles were analyzed after applying strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. The findings provide preliminary support for our hypothesis of a significant underutilization gap, showing that research is concentrated on accuracy systems, while high-potential areas identified as critical by experts, such as athlete safety, represent only 0.6% of the analyzed literature. The study contributes a conceptual framework based on five categories established by experts, according to the identified use cases, providing guidance for future AI integration and interdisciplinary research in the sports officiating ecosystem. Based on the results, we point to future applications and lines of research aimed at integrating AI as a tool for sports refereeing.