ObjectiveTo describe the implementation and effectiveness of an online medical writing elective for thirdyear student pharmacists. MethodsA 16-week asynchronous online medical writing elective was developed and evaluated through anonymous pre-and post-course surveys administered to 5 student cohorts (2019 to 2023).The pre-course survey measured baseline confidence in medical writing and peer feedback skills.The post-course survey assessed changes in confidence after students completed 2 major writing assignments, each with a peer review component. Results J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o fA total of 188 students (93.1%) completed the pre-course survey, and 98 students (48.5%) completed the post-course survey.Most students had no prior experience in publishing, but did have prior experience providing peer feedback.Post-course survey results noted that compared to baseline, students demonstrated significantly increased confidence in medical writing competencies following course completion.These included writing for a patient audience, applying AMA style, and producing content that is clear, scientifically accurate, and free from bias.Students also showed increased confidence in composing original content without templates and in evaluating the work of their peers. ConclusionsA medical writing elective with opportunities for formative feedback through peer review significantly improved students' confidence in key aspects of medical writing.Our findings underscore the value of a focused curriculum that incrementally builds core writing competencies through assignments and structured feedback.
Sarna et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: