ABSTRACT There are two principal methods of simulating refractive errors. Either the retinal image can be defocused by an optical system, usually a positive lens, placed in front of an observer's eye (observer method), or the source of the retinal image can be defocused as it is projected onto a screen or photograph (source method). There are significant differences between the two methods, differences that make lit difficult to compare results. However, the source method, which is the more artificial, seems to be superior for a number of reasons. The results of these two methods can be compared using a common or interchangeable parameter for specifying the level of defocus. A convenient parameter is the size of the defocused image of a point, measured either in image space (linear or angular diameter on the retina) or in object space (angular diameter of the blur disc projected back into object space), with the angular diameter measured from the respective nodal point of the eye. Methods of measuring the angular blur‐disc diameter for both methods are discussed and the validity of the formula ω = D ΔL, is investigated, where ω is the angular diameter of the blur disc, D is the observer's pupil diameter, and ΔL is the dloptric defocus.
Chan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.