This study addresses a current research gap in Law concerning Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law in African Transitions in Senegal. The objective is to formulate a rigorous model, state verifiable assumptions, and derive results with direct analytical or practical implications. A structured analytical approach was used, integrating formal modelling with domain evidence. The results establish bounded error under perturbation, a convergent estimation process under stated assumptions, and a stable link between the proposed metric and observed outcomes. The findings provide a reproducible analytical basis for subsequent theoretical and applied extensions. Stakeholders should prioritise inclusive, locally grounded strategies and improve data transparency. Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law in African Transitions, Senegal, Africa, Law, action research This work contributes a formal specification, transparent assumptions, and mathematically interpretable claims.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fatoumata Ndiaye
Amina Diop
Ibrahima Sarr
Institut Pasteur de Dakar
Université Alioune Diop de Bambey
Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ndiaye et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37506e48c4981c676e3a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19096805