Background: Breast reshaping is a common request after massive weight loss, yet implant use in this population remains controversial due to higher complication risks and limited comparative data on implant types. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted from January 2016 to December 2022 at a public hospital, included adult female patients who underwent breast reshaping with implants. Exclusion criteria were weight loss through diet/exercise alone, a history of breast cancer, poorly managed comorbidities, and significant psychiatric disorders. The procedures were performed by a consistent surgical team, with implant selection tailored to each patient based on preoperative assessments of breast ptosis and individual expectations. Data analysis included patient demographics, surgical specifics, and postoperative complications. Results: Among the 56 patients studied, 38 received polyurethane implants and 18 received textured implants. The study found no significant differences between these groups regarding age, initial weight, body mass index, weight loss, return to normal activities, patient satisfaction, implant positioning, or complication rates. The overall complication rate was 37.5%, with no significant variation between the 2 implant types. Conclusions: The study underscores the challenges of achieving optimal results in post–massive weight loss breast reshaping due to unique deformities and a higher risk of complications. Despite ongoing debate over the ideal implant type, this research indicated no clear superiority between polyurethane and textured implants. Future research directions should explore newer ultra-light implants and compare implant-based techniques with autologous tissue approaches to further refine outcomes in this patient population.
Budini et al. (Sun,) studied this question.