Efficient integration of logistics and process control stands as a pivotal element for the economic viability and sustainability of future end-to-end factories. The vertical and horizontal networking of machines presents new opportunities for enhancing production control. Within the logistics chain, interlinking holds the potential to enable a fully automated flow of materials, thus, increasing production adaptability and efficiency. This paper proposes a novel approach to realizing a smart goods inward station by integrating a cost-efficient control logic paired with a material-flow-optimized handling of small load carriers. The developed innovative station overcomes sequential first-in-first-out delivery processes by modifying the material flow of small load carriers and parallelizing unload processes from a dynamic queue, which avoids supply bottlenecks and redundant buffers for optimizing the just-in-time supply chain and reducing non-productive times. By the addition of automated guided vehicles, unloading and delivery processes can be fully automated. A comparison with conventional first-in-first-out systems shows that the modernized smart system increases the pick-up rate through parallel removal options and automated processes, which ultimately reduce lead times. Additionally, the station is equipped with sensors and control logics, which are connected to a logistics system via cost-efficient microcontrollers as modular components. Through these components, it becomes feasible to extend existing logistics chains into Industry-4.0-compliant processes. To illustrate the effectiveness of this approach, the integration of a target-actual comparison within the goods inward station is demonstrated by using a microcontroller-based camera system and radio-frequency identification technology to ensure the completeness and end-to-end tracking of the delivered goods. In this way, the material flow can be controlled more economically, and the supply chain can be organized more efficiently.
Möller et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: