This study argues that Romans, read as a coherent discourse under active covenantcontrols, does not support an anomian theology. Its internal controls begin alreadyin Rom 2:13-15, where not hearers but doers stand in the line of righteousness andthe work of Torah is borne witness in the heart. They continue in Rom 3:31, wherefaith establishes Torah; in Rom 6:14-15, where “not under law” is read as not under the death penalty in direct continuity with Rom 5; in Rom 7:7-14, where Torahis holy and sin is the problem; in Rom 8:1-8, where the weakness lies in flesh andfleshly enmity refuses submission to Yehovah’s Torah; in Rom 10:4-8, where Messiah is Torah’s telos in the matter of righteousness and Paul turns back to Deut 30:6-10; and in Rom 13:8-10, where love appears as Torah’s social form. The reading isgoverned not only by Romans’ own sequence but by the covenant horizon of Isa8:20, Deut 30:6-10, Jer 31:31-33, and Ezek 36:26-27: not Torah removed, but Torahestablished, internalized, and lived from the heart
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
ørjan myhre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
ørjan myhre (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf3955c7b3c90b18b43daa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19121760