Passive corner reflectors, made typically of metal plates, are widely used as point targets in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and SAR interferometry (InSAR) applications. Drawbacks of such corner reflectors include: (i) high cost, especially when many reflectors are required for monitoring purposes; (ii) creation of localised ground motion in soft or unstable soils; and (iii) attractiveness for thieves. We tested several lower-cost and lighter weight materials for making corner reflectors. A cubic trihedral corner reflector, made of 2 mm thick aluminium plates, served as a standard. It was compared to corner reflectors built from 10 mm thick multiwall polycarbonate sheets covered with: (a) nothing; (b) c. 0.1 mm thick aluminium tape; or (c) aluminium-bearing metallic paint. In Sentinel-1 SAR backscatter imagery, the corner reflectors made of aluminium and polycarbonate sheets covered with aluminium tape (PC-AT) were equally visible. In contrast, the plain polycarbonate sheet and the polycarbonate sheet with aluminium paint were invisible. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of tape microstructure showed a well-distributed and dense layer of aluminium particles, which provides good dielectric response and high visibility in SAR imagery. Furthermore, a PC-AT corner reflector installed on an active landslide site yielded not only highly coherent pixels, but also displacement time series that were closely correlated with temporal variations of in-situ ground properties, such as soil moisture and matric suction. In terms of material cost and weight, the PC-AT corner reflector is approximately 94% cheaper and 71% lighter than the aluminium corner reflector, based on current market prices in Ireland. These low-cost, light-weight PC-AT corner reflectors are thus suitable for operational use in SAR- and InSAR-based monitoring.
Azadnejad et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: