Paper 76 defines transputation as the internal adjudicative layer forced under closure and record-divergent choice in diagonal-capable frameworks. This paper presents DSAC (Delta Self-Adjudicative Computation) as a candidate realization family, supported by an abstract interface-level formalization in transputation-lean. We map the -machine architecture—continuous lattice, reflexive constraint graph, scenario-driven execution—to the realization criteria of Paper 76. DSAC is presented as a candidate realization family satisfying the Paper 76 realization criteria; it is evidence of realizability, not the definition of the adjudicative class. We summarize validation evidence from a series of experiments: SAT, Max-SAT, constraint discovery, metric closure, and the traveling salesman problem (TSP). DSAC is not the definition of transputation; it is one implementation family that operationalizes the structural role identified in Paper 76. This overview presents the core NEMS theorem engine and selected applications; stronger domain-specific derivation and ontological synthesis claims belong to separate release surfaces with their own premise bundles and formal artifacts. Trust boundary. Scenario performance is empirical; machine-checked content is the interface layer in transputation-lean (see). No claim is made that the -machine dynamics have been fully formalized in Lean.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nova Spivack
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nova Spivack (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8930e6c1944d70ce042c0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19455354