Generative AI is reshaping teaching and assessment in higher education, but its capacity for misuse raises new concerns about academic integrity. This study examines approaches that higher education educators can take to safeguard honesty in students’ academic work while also harnessing AI to enrich learning and evaluation. Based on a systematic literature review (SLR) method, this study identified five interconnected strategic themes: (1) Policy and Guidelines for AI in Education; (2) AI Education and Training; (3) Attitudes towards GenAI in Education; (4) Transparency, Communication, and Engagement; and (5) Assessment Design and Format. These elements are integrated into a holistic conceptual framework that connects capability development, cultural transformation, and structural safeguards, and presents practical guidance to address key academic integrity challenges. Our findings show that isolated efforts by academics are not enough, and only an integrated, values-led approach can maintain assessment integrity, foster critical and creative skills, and prepare graduates for workplaces increasingly shaped by AI.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Patrick Buckland
Marian Carcary
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning
Mary Immaculate College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Buckland et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd8eee195c95cdefd65e5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.22554/3e0x1n51
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: