We present the Einstein–Karahan Framework v123, a geometrically motivated extension of classical gravitational theory in which spacetime torsion induces an effective dynamical contribution to galactic rotation curves. In contrast to particle-based dark matter models, the framework attributes the observed discrepancies in galactic dynamics to an additional geometric degree of freedom characterized by a dynamically activated torsion field. The model introduces a radial activation mechanism governed by a finite coherence scale, resulting in an effective modification of the rotational velocity profile without altering local gravitational behavior. The resulting phenomenological law is tested against high-quality observational data from the SPARC database using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. We perform a multi-galaxy analysis on representative systems (NGC 3198, NGC 2403, NGC 2903, and NGC 891), achieving statistically consistent fits with ²/dof 0. 8 - 1. 2 and physically plausible stellar mass-to-light ratios. Crucially, the torsion coherence parameter rₛ exhibits remarkable stability across galaxies, clustering around rₛ 4. 8, kpc. This emergent scale suggests the presence of a universal geometric structure underlying galactic dynamics. The framework thus transitions from a phenomenological fitting model to a physically motivated effective field theory with predictive capability. While further validation across larger galaxy samples and a full covariant derivation remain necessary, the present results establish the Einstein–Karahan Framework as a promising geometric alternative to dark matter in the description of galactic rotation curves.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Asil Karahan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Asil Karahan (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2bcae4eeef8a2a6b0ae8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19557142
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: