Abstract：In the era of continuously deepening comprehensive reforms under the "Three-Whole Education" (whole-staff education, whole-process education, and all-round education) framework, how to promote the transition of the two major educational systems in universities, namely ideological and political education in courses and daily ideological and political education, from "operating independently" to "systemic collaboration" has become a key issue in enhancing the effectiveness of moral education and talent cultivation. Based on the holistic and systematic concept of "Three-Whole Education", this paper deeply analyzes the practical dilemmas faced by ideological and political education in courses and daily ideological and political education in universities, such as goal separation, subject isolation, process disconnection, and resource dispersion. Furthermore, from the five dimensions of goal collaboration, subject collaboration, process collaboration, resource collaboration, and evaluation collaboration, a collaborative mechanism model for the deep integration of the two is systematically constructed. Finally, a practical path centered on strengthening top-level design, building a collaborative platform, and improving institutional guarantees is proposed, aiming to provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for constructing a new pattern of integrated, three-dimensional, and coherent ideological and political education work.
Liu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: