Background/Objectives: Chronic wounds that fail to respond to standard wound care (SWC) remain a major clinical challenge. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an advanced regenerative therapy that delivers platelet-derived growth factors involved in angiogenesis and tissue repair. However, clinical data in Asian populations and evidence regarding ulcers associated with vasculitis or microangiopathic ischemia remain limited. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and treatment frequency of autologous PRP gel prepared using the newly approved AutoloGel System® in Japan. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 20 patients with chronic ulcers unresponsive to ≥28 days of conventional therapy by a wound specialist. PRP gel was applied weekly for up to eight sessions under current insurance coverage. Primary outcomes were wound healing rate at 12 weeks after PRP initiation and healing duration. Healing time during specialist-directed conventional therapy was compared with that following PRP using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Twenty patients (mean age 60 ± 15 years) with diverse refractory ulcers—including diabetic foot ulcers, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, vasculitic ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, and surgical site infections—were analyzed. All wounds achieved complete epithelialization within 12 weeks. Healing time decreased significantly from 87.2 ± 77.1 days during conventional therapy to 47.9 ± 28.5 days after PRP initiation (median 60 vs. 44 days, p = 0.0107). No treatment-related adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Weekly autologous PRP gel therapy prepared using the AutoloGel System® was associated with improved healing outcomes in refractory chronic wounds. Favorable outcomes were observed in traditionally difficult-to-treat conditions, including vasculitis-associated and microangiopathic ischemic ulcers. These findings suggest the potential role of PRP in promoting angiogenesis and improving microcirculatory perfusion in wounds associated with microvascular dysfunction.
Fujii et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: