Abstract Section 1 introduces the notion of transcendental arguments as arguments from the necessary conditions of possibility. What distinguishes them from other forms of deductive reasoning is the so-called transcendental conditional of the logical form ‘ p is possible only if q ’. Section 2 outlines three models for such arguments, analysing transcendental conditionals in terms of material implication, strict implication, and presupposition (semantic and pragmatic). Section 3 considers competing interpretations of Kant’s Refutation of Idealism presented in the B-edition of the Critique of Pure Reason . Section 4 summarises the main results of the paper.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stanisław Jędrczak
University of Warsaw
Kantian Review
University of Warsaw
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stanisław Jędrczak (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b7c585696592c86eb535 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415426101344
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: