Contemporary retail operations are confronted with escalating complexity in demand forecasting and inventory management, driven by non-linear demand variability, promotional amplification, seasonal fluctuations, and the competitive imperatives of omnichannel commerce. Conventional forecasting paradigms-predicated upon moving averages, exponential smoothing, and linear extrapolation-demonstrably fail to capture the multivariate, nonlinear interactions governing retail demand dynamics. This paper introduces SmartRetail AI, a comprehensive, end-to-end retail intelligence platform that integrates ensemble machine learning with classical inventory optimisation theory within a unified data architecture. The system is constructed upon a structured synthetic dataset encompassing 4,250 daily transaction records across five representative Fast-Moving Consumer Goods and e-commerce product categories, spanning 850 operational days. The proposed forecasting engine deploys productlevel Random Forest Regressor models-each trained independently to capture category-specific demand dynamics-to generate thirty-day forward demand forecasts. Engineered temporal features including day-of-week indicators, monthly seasonality encodings, weekend binary flags, and promotional activity markers constitute the input feature space. The inventory optimisation module applies the classical safety stock formulation at a 95% service level target (Z = 1.65), computing product-specific reorder points as a function of historical demand variability and a three-day supply lead time. Analytical outputs are persisted in a normalised MySQL relational schema comprising three tables-historical sales, demand forecasts, and inventory metrics-and rendered through an executive intelligence dashboard. Comparative evaluation against moving average baselines demonstrates Mean Absolute Error reductions of 23.4% to 47.8% across product categories, with Root Mean Square Error improvements ranging from 19.7% to 44.1%. The platform achieves a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 12.7% for high-volume staples and 24.3% for low-velocity electronics, establishing its operational viability across diverse retail demand profiles. These results validate the proposed framework as a practically deployable, analytically rigorous alternative to legacy forecasting methodologies.
Rohith et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: