That Hittite denominatives in a ( i ) correspond to IE verbs in -āyō is supported by etymologies ( ) and by agreement with Latin in method of formation (cf. aestuāre but piscārī ) from u- and i -stems. In Hittite no ā -stems have been recognized, the suffix is therefore not a conglomerate. This adds new interest to the fact that in IE (esp. Rig Veda and Homer) many -āyō verbs have no corresponding ā -stem. Probably the IE ā -stems are largely ‘backformations’ patterned on a number of ā -stems that were (cf. Hirt) simply dissyllabic bases.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
E. H. Sturtevant
Language
Yale University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
E. H. Sturtevant (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0a2e553a5433e34b45c2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/408991