Traditional parenting research has relied on typological models that categorize behaviors into rigid styles (e.g., authoritative and permissive), often neglecting the intentions and contextual factors that give meaning to caregiving. These models, based on samples lacking diversity, have contributed to measurement challenges, cultural misinterpretations, and deficit-based portrayals of marginalized families. In this article, we introduce a function-based framework organizing parenting according to its primary caregiving goals: affective (emotional connection), behavioral (structure and guidance), and cultural (value and identity transmission). By centering purpose and context and distinguishing caregiver intentions from realized interactional function, this framework reframes parenting as a dynamic, goal-directed process responsive to developmental needs and sociocultural realities. We argue that this approach allows for more inclusive, precise, and ecologically valid assessments of parenting across diverse families. We review the limitations of legacy frameworks, outline the theoretical foundations of the function-based framework, and present implications for research design, measurement, intervention, and policy. We conclude by advocating for a science of parenting that recognizes variation as adaptation and centers the lived goals of families navigating diverse social, structural, and cultural environments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rodriguez et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69f1547f879cb923c4944b77 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002189
Violeta J. Rodriguez
Sungha Kang
Loyola University Chicago
Qimin Liu
Boston University
Developmental Psychology
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Boston University
Loyola University Chicago
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: