What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To develop a framework for understanding quality, safety, and risk in anaesthesiology.

April 29, 2026Open Access

Defining Quality, Safety and Risk from an Anaesthesiology perspective – Protocol for a Scoping Review

Key Points

To develop a framework for understanding quality, safety, and risk in anaesthesiology.
Conducting a scoping review protocol following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Utilizing the SPIDER framework for eligibility criteria.
Implementing a systematic data extraction process based on predefined tables.
Identifying key quality indicators, safety measures, and risk factors in anaesthesiology practice.
Establishing a comprehensive checklist for future analayis and research.

Abstract

This is the Entended Data document which includes the PRISMA-ScR Checklist, Search Strategy, Eligibility criteria as per the SPIDER framework, and Data extraction table for a protocol paper of a scoping literature review titled: 'Defining Quality, Safety and Risk from an Anaesthesiology perspective- Protocol for a Scoping Review.'

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Walsh et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154e0879cb923c4945395 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19732058

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Bookmark

View Full Paper