Background/Objectives: While human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is pivotal for breast cancer management, its reliance on additional tissue processing beyond routine H&E staining remains a clinical burden. Although virtual staining offers a potential solution, current methods often fail to explicitly account for HER2 score-specific expression patterns. To address this gap, we developed a score-aware framework designed for the precise generation of virtual HER2 IHC images. Methods: We introduce the non-contrastive multi-task (NCMT) framework, which integrates negative-free patch alignment, style–content constraints, and auxiliary HER2 score supervision for high-fidelity H&E-to-IHC translation. For rigorous evaluation, the model was validated on the BCI dataset, utilizing an official split of 3896 training and 977 independent test images derived from 51 whole-slide images. Results: NCMT demonstrated superior virtual staining performance, achieving a Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) of 38.8, a Kernel Inception Distance (KID) of 5.6, and an average Perceptual Hash Value (PHV) of 0.439. In downstream HER2 scoring tasks, while virtual IHC images alone yielded an accuracy of 83.01%, the fusion of H&E and virtual IHC further elevated performance to 97.85% accuracy and a 98.23% F1 score. These findings suggest that our framework effectively preserves diagnostic features while providing complementary information to H&E-based morphological analysis. Conclusions: NCMT enables HER2 score-aware virtual IHC generation from H&E and can serve as a complementary tool for HER2 assessment in digital pathology.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hyunsu Jeong
Chiho Yoon
Jinwoo Kim
Diagnostics
Pohang University of Science and Technology
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Duksung Women's University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jeong et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a49d8c0f03fd67763b3b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16091319
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: