A single intravenous dose of ARG-007 was safe and well tolerated in acute ischaemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy, with no significant difference in treatment-emergent adverse events (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.91-1.15; P=0.72).
RCT (n=93)
1:1
double-blind
Yes
Does a single intravenous dose of ARG-007 improve safety and reduce infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
93 large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of symptom onset, baseline NIHSS > 5, prestroke mRS 0-3, excluding ASPECTS 0-5, at 10 Australian stroke centres.
Single intravenous dose of ARG-007 added to standard-of-care thrombectomy with/without intravenous thrombolysis.
Placebo added to standard-of-care thrombectomy with/without intravenous thrombolysis.
Measures of safetysafety
In patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, a single intravenous dose of ARG-007 was safe and well tolerated but did not significantly reduce infarct volume at 48 hours.
Effect estimate: RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.15)
p-value: p=0.72
Abstract Background and aims The Phase II SEANCON study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of a single intravenous dose of ARG-007 (a cationic poly-arginine peptide with cerebroprotective effects in preclinical models) in patients with AIS undergoing revascularisation by endovascular thrombectomy. Methods SEANCON was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 10 Australian stroke centres. Large vessel occlusion AIS patients, eligible for endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of symptom onset, were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to ARG-007 or placebo. Enrolment criteria included baseline NIHSS 5 and prestroke mRS 0–3, site-assessed ASPECTS 0–5 were excluded. All participants received standard-of-care thrombectomy with/without intravenous thrombolysis. The primary outcomes were measures of safety. The secondary outcome was infarct volume at 48 hours. Results 93 participants were randomized (ARG-007 n = 46; placebo n = 47). Follow-up to day 90 was completed by 77 (83%) participants; 16 (17%) participants died before day 90. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in treatment-emergent adverse events (risk ratio RR:1.02, 95% CI: 0.91-1.15; P = 0.72), mortality at day 90 (RR:1.70, 0.67-4.30, P = 0.26), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR:4.09, 0.47-35.2, P = 0.20), worsening of the index stroke (RR:2.04, 0.76-5.52, P = 0.16), or functional independence at day 90 (mRS 0-2: odds ratio 0.92, 0.36-2.37, P = 0.86). Infarct volume at 48 hours did not differ significantly between groups (ratio (adjusted): 1.65, 0.97–2.81, P = 0.065). A potential subgroup signal favoring ARG-007 was observed in participants with poor collateral circulation. Conclusions In AIS patients, ARG-007 was safe and well tolerated. Conflict of interest David Blacker: Shareholder in Argenica Therapeutics Ltd and is paid a consultancy fee as Chair of the Argenica Clinical Advisory Committee. All other authors have nothing to disclose.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Graeme Hankey
The University of Western Australia
Peter Bailey
Gold Coast Hospital
Bruce Campbell
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
European Stroke Journal
The University of Melbourne
The University of Western Australia
University of Newcastle Australia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hankey et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (n=93). ARG-007 vs. placebo was evaluated on treatment-emergent adverse events (measures of safety) (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91-1.15, p=0.72). A single intravenous dose of ARG-007 was safe and well tolerated in acute ischaemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy, with no significant difference in treatment-emergent adverse events (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.91-1.15; P=0.72).
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fb8bfa21ec5bbf083f8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.026