THE FRAGMENTATION CRISIS AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Abdurashid Abdukarimov's Fractal Metascience Paradigm in confrontation with the perfect sphere, Tempus Antagonicus, the axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of TO

This article presents a complete and expanded critical–propositional analysis of Abdurashid Abdukarimov’s The Fragmentation Crisis and the Ontology of Continuity: From Linear Data Optimization to the Stewardship of Epistemic Conditions, published on Zenodo under the DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20109060. The study examines Abdukarimov’s Fractal Metascience Paradigm (FMP), the Ontology of Continuity, the NULLO principle, the Post-Lingua Trace (PLT), Epistemic Superposition, and the stewardship of epistemic conditions in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The analysis focuses especially on the modal discipline of TO, the Law of Logical Minimum, the initial statistical emergence of the perfect sphere, Tempus Antagonicus, the seven Absolute Truths, the phenomenic elements, the Inducer Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of TO. The article argues that Abdukarimov’s proposal has significant metascientific value, particularly in diagnosing the crisis of informational fragmentation and in proposing mechanisms for preserving semantic continuity across scales. However, it also argues that FMP cannot replace the complete theoretical framework of the Theory of Objectivity. Within TO, the perfect sphere initially emerges in statistical mode as a logical-modal necessity required by the Law of Logical Minimum, while Tempus Antagonicus is demonstrated in the cosmogonic theorem as the dynamic expression resulting from the application of the four later Absolute Truths to the first three. In this critical–propositional reading, the Fractal Metascience Paradigm may enrich TO’s metascientific language of informational preservation, traceability, semantic continuity, and stewardship of knowledge. Nevertheless, it does not replace TO’s cosmogonic and modal foundation, especially regarding the logical emergence of time, universal space, and the perfect sphere as totalizing form. The article also considers the TO thesis that the transcendent element corresponds to knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Theory of Objectivity; Abdurashid Abdukarimov; Fractal Metascience Paradigm; Ontology of Continuity; Fragmentation Crisis; Modal Discipline; Law of Logical Minimum; Perfect Sphere; Tempus Antagonicus; Seven Absolute Truths; Post-Lingua Trace; NULLO Principle; Epistemic Superposition; Inducer Effects; Phenomenic Elements; Cosmogonic Theorem; Cosmological Eras; Informational Continuity; Semantic Preservation; Knowledge Stewardship; Atomic Relations; Atomic Radiations; Transcendent Information; Metascience; Recursive Systems; Modal Ontology.