In atrial fibrillation patients undergoing epicardial left atrial appendage closure, a preoperative LAA thrombus resulted in comparable rates of thromboembolic events (2.3 vs 1.0 per 100 patient-years).
Cohort (n=108)
No
Does the presence of a preoperative LAA thrombus worsen perioperative complications or long-term clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing epicardial left atrial appendage closure?
Epicardial LAAC appears feasible and safe in selected AF patients with preexisting LAA thrombi, challenging the traditional view that it is an absolute contraindication.
Absolute Event Rate: 2.3% vs 1%
Background The presence of a left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus is traditionally considered a contraindication to epicardial left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) because of the risk of periprocedural embolization. This presents a significant challenge for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a high bleeding risk who are intolerant to long-term anticoagulant treatment. The safety and outcomes of epicardial LAAC in patients with a preexisting LAA thrombus remain poorly defined. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 108 AF patients who underwent epicardial LAAC at a single center. Patients were stratified into two groups on the basis of preoperative imaging: the Thrombus Group ( n = 11) and the No-Thrombus Group ( n = 97). Intraoperative management, perioperative complications, and long-term clinical outcomes (cerebrovascular events and all-cause mortality) were compared between the groups. An imaging-based classification of thrombus morphology (Types I-III) was proposed for risk stratification. Results No intraoperative strokes or deaths occurred in either group. Early postoperative complication rates were low and not significantly different between groups. During follow-up, the rates of thromboembolic events (1.0 vs. 2.3 per 100 patient-years) and all-cause mortality (0.3 vs. 0.0 per 100 patient-years) were comparable between the No-Thrombus and Thrombus groups, with no statistically significant differences. Thrombi confined to the LAA tip (Type I) were associated with favorable outcomes. Conclusion Epicardial LAAC appears to be a feasible and safe alternative for stroke prevention in some AF patients with LAA thrombi who are unsuitable for anticoagulation therapy, as it does not increase perioperative risk or compromise long-term treatment efficacy.
Yao et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=108). Preoperative left atrial appendage thrombus vs. No preoperative left atrial appendage thrombus was evaluated on Thromboembolic events. In atrial fibrillation patients undergoing epicardial left atrial appendage closure, a preoperative LAA thrombus resulted in comparable rates of thromboembolic events (2.3 vs 1.0 per 100 patient-years).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: