Abstract Introduction Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and deadly disease characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling and eventual right heart failure. A mainstay of treatment for PAH is prostacyclin therapy which can be delivered via continuous subcutaneous (SQ) or intravenous (IV) infusion. Infusion site reactions are a common occurrence with SQ Treprostinil resulting in discontinuation in approximately 10% of patients. Given that switching from SQ to IV prostacyclin therapy contains risks associated with long-term central venous access such as blood stream infections and deep venous thrombosis, the development of better strategies to improve SQ Treprostinil tolerability are needed. Case Report We report two patients with PAH who developed delayed infusion site reactions to SQ Treprostinil. Both patients were female, in their 30s, with severe group 1 PAH (mean pulmonary artery pressures of 44 and 81 mmHg on right heat catheterization at diagnosis), who had been on SQ Treprostinil for approximately 6 years on a dose around 60 ng/kg/min. Within two weeks of starting a new SQ infusion site, each patient developed a raised, hyperemic site reaction in the area of the infusion catheter draining yellow fluid (Figure 1). Skin patch testing was done from an ampule of preservative-free Treprostinil demonstrating a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction. There was no skin reaction to the Tegaderm dressing alone. Dupilumab 300 mg weekly SQ injections were started for these type 1 hypersensitivity reactions with resolution of the site reactions and pain. Because of this, both patients were able to remain on their SQ Treprostinil infusions. Discussion Infusion site reactions to SQ Treprostinil are common and can necessitate discontinuation of the medication. SQ Treprostinil infusion site reactions typically occur within 48 hours of establishing a new SQ infusion site and are thought to be a local vasodilatory reaction to the Treprostinil itself. These reactions can be minimized by analgesic pain medication and by increasing the Treprostinil infusion concentration. Here we describe two infusion site reactions that occurred two weeks after establishing a new site and were consistent with a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction. These reactions were successfully treated with Dupilumab which allowed the patients to remain on SQ Treprostinil. This abstract is funded by: None
Farrell et al. (Fri,) studied this question.