Most organizational dysfunction is not hidden. It is visible — and untouchable. This combined publication introduces Knowledge Quality (KQ): the first empirical quality standard for action-guiding knowledge, derived from the identification and operationalization of Passive Qualitative Disinformation (PQD) — the condition in which an organization loses awareness that its operative models are models, while those models continue to guide consequential action. The first paper (KQ – A New Approach to Knowledge Quality) develops the conceptual and diagnostic foundation: PQD as an empirical phenomenon, KQ as a domain-independent and scale-independent standard, and the diagnostic primitive that makes qualitative blind spots identifiable. The second paper (Disrupting Consulting: Wrong. Visible. Untouchable. The KQ Legitimacy Lever) develops the strategic implication: KQ as a standalone legitimacy lever that turns protected organizational dysfunction into an actionable, documented finding — without requiring a new framework, a culture program, or another assessment layer. The third paper (Protecting Knowledge Quality: Intellectual Property Architecture) provides a structured due diligence assessment of the KQ/PQD protection position: documented priority since 1997, copyright over the distinctive argumentative corpus, a trademark and certification mark architecture, a closed professional execution layer protected as trade secret, and the expansion topology beyond the consulting entry point. It maps the compound protection architecture across jurisdictions and addresses what it means for prospective strategic partners. The argument is cumulative. Read sequentially.
Glueck et al. (Fri,) studied this question.