What question did this study set out to answer?

May 26, 2026Open Access

QUANTUM INFORMATION EVOLUTION AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Howard Schultz's informational model in confrontation with the axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of TO

Key Points

This article aims to critically analyze Howard Schultz's Quantum Information Evolution in relation to the Theory of Objectivity.
Conducted a propositional analysis of Schultz’s framework against the axioms and elements of the Theory of Objectivity.
Examined convergences and tensions between Schultz's interpretation of quantum mechanics and TO's principles.
Highlights the critique of spacetime as a fundamental reality and emphasizes the role of information.
Identifies tensions in Schulz’s framework, such as the lack of modal necessity and a complete cosmogony.
Suggests a productive dialogue between Schultz’s framework and the Theory of Objectivity, especially in non-spatiotemporal contexts.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Howard Schultz’s Quantum Information Evolution: A Framework for Resolving Quantum Gravity and Other Conundrums, published on Zenodo with DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14947281. Schultz proposes a measurement-centric interpretation of quantum mechanics in which space and time are not fundamental realities, but products of human perception and cognitive organization of measurement sequences. Instead of assuming that particles or wave functions propagate through a preexisting spacetime fabric, Schultz suggests that quantum information evolves within a universal probability space. In dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity, this article examines Schultz’s model in confrontation with the axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of TO. The analysis highlights strong convergences, especially regarding the critique of spacetime as an ultimate substrate, the centrality of information, the constitutive role of measurement/observation, and the relational understanding of objects as stable informational regions. It also identifies relevant tensions, particularly the absence of explicit modal necessity, the lack of a complete cosmogony, and the non-identification of fundamental information with the transcendent element of TO, understood as knowledge/information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The article concludes that Schultz’s framework establishes a highly productive dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity, especially in the fields of quantum information, modal ontology, quantum gravity, and non-spatiotemporal interpretations of physical reality. This analytical text counted on the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Howard Schultz; Quantum Information Evolution; quantum information; measurement-centric interpretation; modal ontology; quantum gravity; spacetime; phenomenic elements; Inducer Effects; cosmogonic theorem; cosmological Eras; atomic radiation; informational transcendence.

Read Full Paperexternally

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay

View Full Paper