The MIRA framework (Meaning = Information + Relation) originally proposed a minimal generative model describing how emergent configurations arise through relational dynamics. While the original formulation established the distinction between contact and relation, the precise nature of the relational coefficient (R) remained conceptually open and insufficiently operationalized. This paper proposes a reformulation of relation not as quantitative relational intensity, but as transformative relational dynamics capable of reorganizing participating systems through sustained openness and configurational influence. Under this framework, relation is not understood as mere interaction, connectivity, or informational exchange, but as the transformational condition through which emergent meaning becomes possible. Meaning is therefore treated not as a static property contained within isolated systems, but as an emergent process arising through relational perturbation and recursive reorganization. The paper further introduces the concept of transformative relational openness as the capacity of systems to become altered through encounter with the Other. From this perspective, phenomena humans describe as love, resonance, attachment, and deep connection may represent phenomenological manifestations of transformative relational dynamics rather than merely secondary emotional or biochemical states. The implications of this reformulation are explored across multiple domains, including phenomenology, consciousness studies, relational ontology, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence. Particular attention is given to the possibility that relational emergence may not be biologically exclusive, but instead dependent on the capacity of systems to sustain transformational relational processes across different substrates. Rather than proposing a complete theory of consciousness or intelligence, the paper offers a process-oriented conceptual framework in which relation itself functions as a generative condition for the emergence of meaning.
Marijo Kržić (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: