We compute, to our knowledge for the first time, the renormalisation-group trajectory of polynomial f (R) gravity with Standard Model matter content from the ultraviolet non-Gaussian fixed point (NGFP) toward the infrared. The result is an AdS-to-de Sitter trajectory: the UV fixed point is AdS-like, with Λ̃* ≈ −1. 10 and G̃* ≈ 0. 90, while the physical trajectory crosses Λ̃ (k) = 0 at k ≈ 0. 21 Mₚₗ and enters the positive-Λ branch. The zero crossing is confirmed directly at n = 3–6, with Δtcross = 0. 008, and Newton's constant remains positive throughout. At n = 7 and n = 8, separatrix shooting identifies the unique trajectory threading the spin-2 singularity boundary layer, with separatrix amplitudes shifting by only ~7% between orders, supporting convergence of the physical trajectory. These results establish that the physical cosmological constant is determined by the RG trajectory, not by the fixed-point sign: a negative UV value does not preclude a positive infrared value. The three-dimensional UV critical surface supplies three relevant amplitudes. The separatrix/regularity condition removes one continuous freedom, and the two IR inputs Gₙ and Aₛ fix the remaining two. Within this truncation and boundary prescription, Λ is then an output, not a free parameter. For the effective cosmological constant, once the vacuum-energy/radiative-stability layer is protected by an independent mechanism, the smallness of Λ in Planck units, Λ/M²ₚₗ ~ H₀²/M²ₚₗ, reduces to the squared ratio of two boundary scales—because the framework provides derived reasons (the NGFP and the feedback attractor) for the dimensionless coupling to be O (1) at both ends, rather than requiring a cancellation. Combined with the Paper I feedback attractor and the Paper III two-boundary framework, the result supplies the UV trajectory side of a conditional determination programme for Λ. The Paper I attractor condition can be expressed as the vanishing of an effective infrared beta function, βIR_Λ = 0, making the UV and IR boundary conditions formally parallel: the dimensionless coupling λ (k) is pinned to O (1) at both ends by derived dynamics rather than assumption. Paper II proposes the Connected Singularity Hypothesis (CSH) as the series' candidate physical coupling mechanism; the present trajectory result does not require the CSH specifically. The trajectory does not yet bridge the full 140 e-foldings from the Planck scale to the Hubble scale. Applying the Friedmann equation to inputs that do not directly insert Λobs yields Λ = 1. 09 × 10⁻⁵² m⁻², within 1. 3% of the Planck 2018 value; some of these inputs retain model dependence through the distance-redshift relation. Paper V's spatial ODE, which navigates the spin-2 boundary layer directly, reaches Aₛ = 6. 6 × 10⁻⁹ at n = 6—within 0. 5 decades of the Planck target—and extending it to the converged n = 8 NGFP is the path to a more direct trajectory-endpoint extraction of Λ, reducing reliance on the Friedmann-equation reconstruction. --This is Paper VI of a six-part series, no more papers are planned. Paper I (Salmond 2026, DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20156389): The Cosmological Constant as a Feedback AttractorPaper II (Salmond 2026, DOI: https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 20222173): Testing a Connected-Singularity Mechanism for Gravitational Feedback CosmologyPaper III (Salmond 2026, DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20222351): Two-Boundary Determination of the Cosmological Constant from Asymptotic Safety and Gravitational FeedbackPaper IV (Salmond 2026, DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20284172): The Cosmological Constant as a Zero-Parameter Prediction of Asymptotic Safety with Standard Model MatterPaper V (Salmond 2026, DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20286625): Resolving the Spin-2 Boundary Layer in f (R) Asymptotic Safety Paper VI (Salmond 2026, DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20286761): Zero Crossing of the Cosmological Constant in f (R) Asymptotic Safety with Standard Model Matter
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Salmond
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Salmond (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f1bfab5b468c44187c0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20394522