Expansive soils pose significant challenges in geotechnical engineering due to their volume changes with moisture variations. A critical distinction exists between a soil’s inherent potential to swell or shrink (governed by intrinsic parameters such as clay content, plasticity index, and activity index) and its actual behaviour under specific site conditions (governed by state parameters like porosity and water content). This paper critically evaluates the reliability of widely used single-index and multi-index classification methods against direct oedometer measurements of swelling pressure. Analysis of nearly 600 tests on natural active clays from four different sites in Romania reveals that, for these soils and site conditions, no single intrinsic parameter—nor any simple pair of parameters—correlates reliably with swelling pressure, demonstrating that these indices merely indicate potential, not actual, behaviour. In contrast, state parameters provide more meaningful insights. Drawing on parallels with collapsible soil mechanics, the study introduces the concept of “saturation-independent pressure” (sip), the stress level beyond which saturated and natural-moisture soil behaviours converge. Furthermore, a practical calculation method is proposed for estimating both foundation heave (upon saturation) and shrinkage (upon drying), based on double oedometer compressibility curves. Notably, a strong correlation (R2 = 0.79–0.86) is demonstrated between swelling pressure and the specific swelling strain measured under an initial load of 12.5 kPa, offering a rapid and inexpensive screening tool for identifying potentially problematic active clays.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ernest Daniel Olinic
Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest
Geotechnics
Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ernest Daniel Olinic (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192f2dfab5b468c4418866 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics6020052