This case note examines the Supreme Court’s decision in State of Punjab v Davinder Singh (1 August 2024), which reconsidered the constitutional validity of internal differentiation within Scheduled Caste (SC) reservations in India. India’s reservation policy, a constitutionally recognised form of affirmative action designed to address historical caste-based exclusion, has traditionally treated SCs as a homogeneous category. The Court held that sub-classification within SCs is constitutionally permissible to ensure a more equitable distribution of reservation benefits. The judgment, therefore, marks a shift from a model of formal equality towards a more substantive and differentiated understanding of equality. This case note analyses the implications of the decision for two competing approaches to internal reform: creamy-layer exclusion and sub-categorisation. Creamy layer refers to relatively advanced sections within a backward class that may be excluded from reservation benefits so that such benefits reach the most disadvantaged groups. The note argues that although the judgment acknowledges intra-group inequality, it leaves unresolved tensions between income-based targeting and the continuing structural nature of caste-based disadvantage. The decision consequently raises important questions regarding the future design, justification, and implementation of affirmative action policy in India.
Verma et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: