Background As precision medicine is needed in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), SSc non-specific antibodies might improve the risk stratification in this population.Research Question To evaluate the prevalence and characterize the disease phenotype of SSc patients positive for anti-Ro/SSA alone or in combination with RF antibodies in the largest cohort of SSc patients, focusing on lung involvement.Methods Patients from the EUSTAR database with available data on anti-Ro/SSA and RF antibodies were included. Clinical characteristics of patients with or without anti-Ro/SSA and RF antibodies were compared at baseline. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to identify factors associated with ILD. In patients with ILD at baseline, multivariable mixed-effects models for longitudinal FVC and DLCO were built to assess the impact of anti-Ro/SSA and RF. Prognostic factors for the ILD progression and death during follow-up were tested by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.Results Among the 4,221 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 641 (15.2%) had anti-Ro/SSA antibodies. These patients exhibited a higher prevalence of muscular involvement (p < 0.01), pulmonary hypertension (p = 0.06), and ILD (p < 0.01) at baseline. Over 14,066 follow-up visits, anti-Ro/SSA independently predicted the presence of ILD (OR 1.24 1.07-1.43, p < 0.01). Among anti-Ro/SSA+/RF+ patients, who represented 4.1% of the cohort, ILD was more prevalent as compared to single positive or negative anti-Ro/SSA and RF patients. Anti-Ro/SSA+/RF+ double-positive patients had a more severe ILD, with lower FVC% (R -4.12 -7.85;-0.40; p = 0.03) and lower DLCO% (R -5.4-9.05;-1.74; p < 0.01).Interpretation In the large EUSTAR cohort, anti-Ro/SSA antibodies are detected in 15% of SSc patients and represent an independent risk factor for the presence and severity of ILD, particularly for cases with anti-Ro/SSA+/RF+ double positivity. These data support the inclusion of anti-Ro/SSA and RF antibodies in routine clinical practice to improve the risk stratification of SSc patients.
Burja et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: