Background: High-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have extended the endovascular therapy (EVT) time window to 24 hours post-stroke onset in selected patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Recent retrospective studies indicate that EVT performed beyond 24 hours may still improve clinical outcomes. However, the specific benefit-risk profile in this ultra-late window remains unclear. Aim: The trial is designed to address this evidence gap and determine the benefit-risk balance of EVT in the ultra-late window. Methods and design: The Large Artery occlusion Treated in Extended Time with Mechanical Thrombectomy (LATE-MT) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open, blinded-endpoint assessment (PROBE) clinical trial. The trial adopted an adaptive group-sequential design, recruiting 336 AIS patients with large-vessel occlusion within 24 to 72 hours of the last known well across 35 stroke centers in China. Eligible subjects who meet both clinical and imaging selection criteria are randomized 1:1 to EVT or medical management. Outcomes: The primary outcome is an ordinal shift analysis of scores on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Key secondary outcomes include neurological function at 24 hours and 7 days, death/major disability and utility-weighted mRS (UW-mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes include any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, serious adverse event, and all procedural complications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hongjian Shen
Second Military Medical University
Pengfei Yang
Second Military Medical University
Lili Song
Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology
International Journal of Stroke
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Second Military Medical University
The George Institute for Global Health
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shen et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d236002fbce9130638f6c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930261458848