Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) have long promised optical access to membrane potential, yet their adoption has lagged significantly behind genetically encoded calcium indicators. A central but underappreciated reason is that the metrics used to evaluate and compare GEVIs—fractional fluorescence change (ΔF/F), kinetics, and signal-to-noise ratio—rest on an assumption that is frequently violated: that GEVI fluorescence reflects a single underlying process. In this perspective, we argue that GEVI signals are composite optical measurements, arising from the superposition of voltage-dependent fluorescence, intracellular and nonresponsive signal, background, and contributions from neighboring cells. Under these conditions, ΔF/F is not a measure of sensor sensitivity but a contrast metric whose value depends on baseline fluorescence composition, optical sampling, and imaging configuration. This reinterpretation has two key consequences. First, it explains a substantial source of variability in GEVI performance that is currently attributed to noise or experimental inconsistency. Second, and more importantly, it reveals that the complexity of GEVI signals is not a limitation to be minimized but a resource to be exploited. By resolving composite signal components, GEVIs can report multiplexed physiological variables, expose hidden conformational states of voltage-sensing domains, probe membrane organization, and reveal intracellular and intercellular electrical coupling. We propose that realizing the full potential of GEVIs requires treating ΔF/F not as a gold standard for sensor performance, but as one interpretable component of a richer optical measurement whose structure encodes multiple layers of cellular physiology.
Frankiv et al. (Fri,) studied this question.