This research note proposes a possible reformulation of the cosmological constant problem based on local monopole self-screening of zero-point stress. The large microscopic zero-point stress is not assumed to be small; rather, its local monopole component is assumed to be screened by a vacuum response required for stability, so that it does not appear directly as a long-range gravitational source. The late-time dark-energy-like component is modeled not as a finely tuned leftover of zero-point energy, but as a coarse-grained stress-correlation residue obtained through a nonlinear response-kernel projection of connected stress-tensor two-point functions. This version also includes a possible early-universe extension. The self-screening efficiency is treated as phase-dependent: an early weakly screened vacuum phase may leave a large unscreened vacuum-like stress, which can drive inflation-like expansion. The later relaxation into a self-screened phase suppresses the monopole component and may provide a phenomenological route to reheating through the release of effective vacuum-sector energy into radiation. The note explicitly discusses several major logical gaps of this extension, including the origin of the screening efficiency, the vacuum-like equation of state of the unscreened component, the separation between released vacuum energy and radiation-transfer rate, the absence of a microscopic reheating action, and the lack of derived primordial perturbation predictions. It does not claim a complete theory of the cosmological constant, inflation, or reheating, but presents an effective research program and a set of consistency conditions for further investigation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
hideo umihara
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
hideo umihara (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250c507def13d035e1c6f1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20554306
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: