Abstract The paper emphasizes the need to combining chronology and diatopic variation to establish a valid periodization of Northwest Germanic. Drawing on different types of evidence – reconstruction, loanwords in Fenno-Ugric and not least runic data (such as the older runic inscriptions, plus Anglo-Frisian and South Germanic runic evidence) – I argue that the NWGmc. continuum predates the earliest runic traditions which start in the 1 st or 2 nd century AD. This dating is in stark contrast to the standard view in Germanic philology as expressed by Marold and Zimmermann (1995) and Fulk (2018, p. 16).
Michael Schulte (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: