This work introduces a dynamical scalar field n ∈ (0, 4) that quantifies the complexity of the interaction network among Planck units in three-dimensional physical space (D = 3). The field evolves together with the volume, generates discrete phase transitions (d = 0 → 1 → 2 → 3), and carries an energy ledger Eₙ = xⁿ (x = 2) derived from the geometric measure. The framework equips n with two geometry-derived functions — a kinetic function K (n) and a potential U (n) — thereby establishing a non-singular, closed bounce cycle. Dark energy is interpreted as the unfolding energy released as form gains dimensionality. With the structural bound w ≥ −1, the framework yields the prediction w₀ ≈ −0. 88 ± 0. 02 (numerical; slow-roll check −0. 86). Because both x and the energy form are derived from geometry, this is an uncalibrated prediction (the only calibrated parameter is nₜoday ≈ 3. 3), and it is structurally consistent with the dynamical-dark-energy direction of DESI DR2 (w₀ > −1, wₐ < 0). The non-singular bounce is realized at the two ends by two independent physical agents: a gravity-triggered turnaround at the matter end (n → 4⁻), and a classical bang established by Planck-density closure at the Planck end (n → 0⁺). The same equations describe both cosmological and local black-hole collapse; this self-similarity predicts every black hole to be a cycle core. A geometric motivation for the matter–energy–force hierarchy is offered; however, it should not be read as a derivation of the gauge structure or of Standard-Model phenomenology (see Section 1, Scope of the Work).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hamdi Barut
Izmir University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hamdi Barut (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a27add2a963992e16267f99 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20579536
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: