Prison violence is often managed through staff-led strategies, yet little research examines incarcerated people's role in prevention. This study explores peer-driven violence interruption in a high-security prison after a major disturbance. Drawing on interviews with 24 incarcerated men and ethnographic observation, findings highlight four themes: creation of an alternative unit, continuous “temperature checks,” credibility-based intervention, and structural constraints such as lockdowns and staff mistrust. Violence interruption emerged as a staged, situational process requiring judgment about engagement and withdrawal. The research underscores incarcerated persons as active agents in co-producing safety, and offers implications for correctional policy and peer-led prevention.
Hayden P. Smith (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: