We study the one-loop correction to the four-dimensional Newton constant 1/GN on the supersymmetric Minkowski₄ x S² vacuum of six-dimensional N= (1, 0) gauged Einstein-Maxwell (Salam-Sezgin) supergravity, and reduce it to a compact closed form. Because the q=1 monopole vacuum is supersymmetric, the calculation is intrinsically supersymmetric: it runs over the four-dimensional N=1 Kaluza-Klein supermultiplets, bosons and fermions together, in the two-derivative theory obtained as the M -> infinity limit of the Pang-Pope-Sezgin spectrum. The one-loop logarithmic renormalization of 1/GN is the heat-kernel sum Delta = sum (-1) F (1/6 - xiₛ) dofₛ c₁s, which for a mass-degenerate N=1 multiplet collapses to -c₁ Str (dof * xi). Of the five universal curvature couplings, three are sourced heat-kernel results (xi₁/2, xi₁, and the massive Fierz-Pauli value xi₂) ; xi₃/2 rests on a structural Stueckelberg derivation, and xi₀ on Einstein-frame N=1 supergravity matching. Conditional on these inputs and a stated matching assumption, the massive vector multiplets cancel while the massive supergravity multiplet does not, and the Kaluza-Klein tower contribution to 1/GN is Delta = -1/10, carried entirely by the massive supergravity tower. This is a compactification-threshold contribution, distinct from the ordinary four-dimensional running of the massless sector; it carries no target value and no numerology. An appendix isolates the regularization error of the superseded preprint (doi: 10. 5281/zenodo. 19160221): a polynomial-split spectral regularization silently drops a finite term, exactly -c²/2 per curvature-shifted tower (mu = u² - c). Worked examples: the genuine neutral-tower value is -1/15 (not -17/480), the genuine charged monopole-tower value is -1/40 (not +1/10; there is no sign flip), and the corrected 13-sector sum of the superseded preprint is -2/15 (not 43/15). This paper supersedes the withdrawn preprint at doi: 10. 5281/zenodo. 19160221.
Jeremy Jacala (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: