Smart museums increasingly rely on digital media, interactive installations, artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and virtual reality to support cultural communication and visitor engagement. However, existing studies have mainly examined specific technologies, usability, or visitor satisfaction, while a systematic and quantitative framework for comparing interactive experience across different smart museums remains limited. To address this gap, this study proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework for evaluating smart museum interactive experience. Based on the Strategic Experiential Modules, an evaluation system consisting of five dimensions—Sense, Feel, Think, Act, and Relate—and sixteen indicators was constructed. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was used to determine subjective weights from expert judgments, the entropy method was applied to capture the data-driven dispersion characteristics of expert evaluation data, and a game-theoretic combination weighting strategy was used to integrate the two weighting results. Subsequently, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was employed to compare five representative smart museum cases. The results show that Zhejiang Provincial Museum achieved the highest relative closeness value (Ci = 0.9891), followed by Shanghai Museum (Ci = 0.8457) and Hunan Museum (Ci = 0.5326). Robustness analysis further showed that the ranking order remained consistent under entropy weights, AHP weights, average weights, and game-theoretic combined weights. The Friedman test indicated no significant difference in the relative closeness coefficients across weighting schemes (χ2 = 1.200, p = 0.753). These findings indicate that the proposed framework can effectively identify relative strengths and weaknesses in smart museum interactive experience and provide a replicable decision-support tool for experience-oriented museum design and optimization.
Dong et al. (Fri,) studied this question.