This article examines the figure of the ‘sympathetic’ tramp and complementary tramp pair, as it develops from popular entertainment into modernist theatre, culminating in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. It traces a line from music-hall and comic traditions – such as Chaplin, Keaton, Laurel and Hardy, Karl Valentin and Liesl Karlstadt and the Danish cartoonist Storm P. – to the bowler-hatted duo of Vladimir and Estragon. These earlier partnerships often consisted of mismatched companions: one slightly more authoritative, the other more passive or childlike but frequently philosophical. Together they formed a comic unit defined by dependency, repetition and shared misfortune. Beckett draws on this tradition but reduces it to its bare essentials. Vladimir and Estragon are not just tramps; they are a vagabond pair, a pseudo-couple whose identity depends on their continued presence together. They quarrel, embrace, threaten to part and then remain. Their bowlers and boots become key stage objects linked to memory, identity and thought. This is especially the case of Lucky, whose hat enables his chaotic monologue. By placing Godot within the tradition of comic double acts, the article argues that Beckett’s tramps operate on two levels at once: comic entertainers and philosophical figures through whom Beckett explores the failure of language, philosophy through physical comedy and the conditions of human existence.
Ian Butcher (Fri,) studied this question.