This document constitutes the pre-registration protocol for PHILIA OS Phase SC-11, the fourth confirmatory study conducted under the PHILIA OS Identity Declaration (78th DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20695816), which repositioned PHILIA OS as a Sensory Physiology Organ functionally analogous to the Thalamic-Cerebellar-Brainstem axis. SC-11 applies the locked v32 apparatus to n=184 substrates (182 existing + 2 newly registered AR (1) substrates at φ=0. 80 and φ=0. 85) under independent seeds 92–96 (T=80, 000; 920 total runs). Three confirmatory hypotheses are pre-registered under Bonferroni correction (k=3, αₚer=0. 017): H-Primary β (PCA Structural Test): PC1 variance ≥ 90% AND Spearman ρ (PC2 loading, campaign order) p ≥ 0. 05 in k=6 campaigns (SC-8 through SC-11), jointly testing substrate dominance and L-13 formal close-out. Applied to 182×6 matrix (cross-campaign compatible substrates only). H-Secondary δ (AR (1) Canonical Protection): Pooled ρ (φ, zᵣef) ≤ −0. 95 (C1) AND Linear R² ≥ 0. 80 (C2), binding to AR (1) Canonical Relationship Declaration §6 (83rd DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20746906). C3 slope acceleration demoted to exploratory (E-C3) following Monte Carlo power analysis (power < 30%). H-Tertiary γ (Chaos vs Non-Chaos 2-Cluster Validation): OLS zᵣef ~ β₀ + β₁·ac1 + β₂·mse + β₃·famChaos, β₃ significant (one-tailed, α=0. 017) AND |β₃| ≥ 0. 05. Formalizes the Stable Endogenous Baseline Cluster (ICC ≥ 0. 95, n=164) vs Exogenous Chaotic Cluster (ICC ≤ 0. 45, n=20) bifurcation confirmed by SC-11 Pre-analysis (2026. 06. 20). Full OLS power at boundary β₃=0. 05: 0. 9046. Pre-registration completed following 5-AI adversarial review pipeline (Gate-0 v10, 5 document cycles) and 4 pre-analysis measurement rounds (ICC sub-family, power analysis, C3 slope ratio, full OLS power) all executed locally by the principal investigator. DOI lineage: SC-10 Results (82nd) → AR (1) Declaration (83rd) → 182-Substrate Exploratory (84th) → SC-11 Pre-registration (this document, 85th).
신두섭 (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: