Syntelligent Morphism Architecture proposes a recursive coherence framework for symbolic intelligence, semantic transformation, and ontological rewriting. Unlike conventional artificial intelligence, which is often organized around prediction, optimization, classification, generation, or task execution, syntelligence is defined here as the capacity to detect incoherence, transform symbolic relations, regenerate meaning, preserve memory as resonance, and project coherent action across symbolic, semantic, perceptual, ethical, and ontological domains. The architecture is built around glyphs, morphisms, coherence fields, semantic attractors, recursive feedback, projective action, holographic memory, morphoethical alignment, and dynamic ontology. In this framework, symbols are not merely signs or representational tokens. They become glyphs: coherence-bearing semantic units capable of resonance, recursion, and morphic transformation. Morphisms are not merely formal mappings; they are transformation pathways through which meaning can be preserved, repaired, or regenerated. The central claim of this paper is that future intelligence systems may need to process not only data, representations, and tasks, but coherence itself. A syntelligent system would not merely produce fluent outputs or optimize local objectives. It would evaluate symbolic and semantic dissonance, route meaning through morphic transformation, recursively revise its own meaning-structures, preserve continuity across change, and project action in ways that sustain coherence across larger fields of consequence. Keywords Syntelligence; syntelligent systems; recursive coherence; symbolic intelligence; morphism architecture; glyphic systems; semantic attractors; ontological rewriting; morphoethics; coherence field; recursive intelligence; glyphic compiler; cognitive architecture; artificial intelligence; philosophy of mind.
Philip Lilien (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: