Abstract. Permanent laser scanning (PLS) is an effective tool for near-continuous monitoring of topographical changes in beach-dune systems. While PLS systems were traditionally costly, the emergence of affordable LiDAR sensors enables larger-scale setups with multiple scanners or sites. However, the different characteristics compared to high-end devices, create challenges for one-on-one replacement. To assess how low-cost sensors can replace high-end sensors, we compare the performance of a setup with several low-cost Livox AVIA sensors to a single high-end RIEGL VZ-2000i sensor in its ability to capture an embryonic dune field with large variation in topography. This is evaluated using HELIOS++ virtual laser scanning (VLS). To also assess the representativeness of the simulations, we further compare the VLS to real-world measurements with the Livox AVIA. Based on a VLS setup with six AVIAs mounted on tripods at 2 m above ground, a coverage of 52% can be obtained, which is similar to the coverage of a single RIEGL VZ-2000i on a tower 8 m high. The real-world experiments confirm the VLS results with a slightly lower point cloud coverage of 42%. Furthermore, the effective range of the Livox AVIA in a beach-dune system lies around 100-150 m. At larger ranges, only pulses at high incidence angles (angle between surface and incoming beam, >20o) are registered at the scanner. The variations in coverage between the VLS and real-world scans highlight the need for careful consideration of the occlusion potential of different representations of the topography, beam divergence shapes, and the moisture conditions.
Hulskemper et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: