Purpose of the Study: This study examines how Somaliland has achieved durable peace and effective counter-terrorism despite lacking a Weberian monopoly on force. It explores how hybrid security governance, combining state institutions with clan elders, customary law, religious authorities, and local communities, provides a legitimate and sustainable alternative to conventional state-centred security models. Methodology: The study employs a qualitative single-case study design using Somaliland as an instructive case. It relies on secondary data drawn from scholarly literature on state formation, hybrid political order, governance, and counter-terrorism. Comparative analysis with south-central Somalia is used to identify governance mechanisms explaining contrasting security outcomes. Findings: The findings demonstrate that Somaliland’s relative peace and resilience against violent extremism result from a hybrid security governance system integrating customary institutions with formal state structures. Four mutually reinforcing mechanisms underpin this success: legitimacy derived from locally accepted authority, community-based early warning through local knowledge, customary dispute resolution that reduces grievances, and community-embedded policing that enhances cooperation between citizens and security agencies. Unlike conventional Weberian state-building approaches, the hybrid model prevents extremist groups from exploiting governance gaps by fostering public trust, ownership, and collective responsibility for security. Conclusion: The study concludes that hybrid security governance represents a credible and context-sensitive counter-terrorism paradigm where Weberian state-building has proved ineffective. While not without limitations, Somaliland’s experience demonstrates that security is more sustainably achieved through legitimate partnerships between state institutions and society than through centralized coercive authority alone.
Abdiweli et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: