Carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites (CFRTPs) have attracted increasing attention in aerospace, transportation, marine engineering, and other advanced manufacturing fields owing to their high specific mechanical properties, impact resistance, weldability, reprocessibility, and potential recyclability. However, the high melt viscosity of thermoplastic matrices, the permeability limitations associated with different reinforcement architectures, and the chemical inertness of carbon fiber surfaces continue to restrict resin impregnation, interfacial bonding, defect control, and forming stability. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in CFRTP manufacturing from the perspective of material-derived processing challenges and interface engineering. First, representative thermoplastic matrix systems and reinforcement architectures are discussed, with emphasis on their effects on processability, crystallization behavior, resin flow, and load transfer. Subsequently, six major forming processes, including hot stamping, injection molding, pultrusion, filament winding, automated fiber placement, and additive manufacturing, are critically compared in terms of processing principles, typical defects, technical limitations, and application boundaries. Particular attention is given to process-induced quality issues such as voids, wrinkling, springback, fiber breakage, warpage, insufficient consolidation, and weak interlayer bonding. Finally, interface engineering strategies, including chemical surface modification, interfacial structural design, and functional interlayer design, are reviewed as practical routes to improve wetting, shorten impregnation pathways, and enhance fiber–matrix load transfer in high-viscosity thermoplastic systems. This review highlights that CFRTP manufacturing should be understood as a coupled materials–processing–interface problem rather than a single forming operation. Future development is discussed with emphasis on reproducible manufacturing, processability-oriented materials, scalable interface engineering, predictive modeling, and standardized structural validation.
Sun et al. (Fri,) studied this question.