ABSTRACT Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promising tool for diagnosing challenging infections like tuberculosis (TB). However, previous studies largely focused on case-specific application of mNGS in TB diagnosis. Thus, we conducted a retrospective observational study to first systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of mNGS for TB diagnosis. We retrieved a total of 16,776 results of the seven TB diagnostic assays, including mNGS, tuberculosis IgG antibody, TB interferon-γ release assay (TB-IGRA), TB-DNA, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), culture, and acid-fast bacilli staining (AFS) from 3,757 participants with suspected TB infection at Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital from September 2021 to July 2024. Diagnostic metrics were compared against a composite reference standard. Microbial composition and a cost-utility analysis were performed. Among seven TB assays studied, the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended assays AFS, culture, and Xpert, as well as TB-IGRA, were requested most frequently for TB diagnosis, whereas mNGS ranked last. mNGS demonstrated the highest specificity (100%), accuracy (72.3%), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.795). Its sensitivity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and tissue was 71.0% and 72.7%, respectively. Sequential use of mNGS after initial WHO-recommended tests (Xpert/Culture/AFS) significantly improved diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 70.4%; AUC, 0.823). Microbial analysis associated Candida albicans with TB. Cost-utility analysis showed sequential mNGS became cost-effective at higher willingness-to-pay thresholds (>200,000 RMB per correct diagnosis). mNGS offers superior specificity for TB diagnosis. A sequential strategy applying mNGS to conventional-test-negative cases provides enhanced diagnostic performance and is cost-effective at higher healthcare investment values, supporting its utility for diagnostically challenging TB. IMPORTANCE This study systematically assesses the diagnostic performance and cost utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for tuberculosis (TB) in a large real-world cohort of 3,757 suspected patients, comparing it against six conventional assays (tuberculosis IgG antibody, TB interferon-γ release assay, TB-DNA, Xpert, culture, and acid-fast bacilli staining). mNGS demonstrated the highest specificity (100%), accuracy (72.3%), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.795), with sensitivities of 71.0% in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and 72.7% in tissue. Notably, sequential use of mNGS after the World Health Organization-recommended tests significantly improved sensitivity to 70.4% and AUC to 0.823. Candida albicans showed significant differences among the three groups. The sequential mNGS strategy was cost-effective compared with no mNGS, and its cost-effectiveness increased with a rising willingness-to-pay threshold. Overall, these results highlight mNGS as a valuable supplementary tool for challenging TB cases, especially when conventional tests are inconclusive, and provide strong evidence for integrating it into diagnostic algorithms to optimize clinical decision-making and resource allocation.
Zhou et al. (Wed,) studied this question.