Hybridizing concentrated solar power (CSP) with residual biomass allows supercritical CO2 (sCO2) power cycles to deliver dispatchable low-carbon electricity, but it is unclear whether the extra equipment of the more efficient layouts adds a life-cycle burden that offsets their thermodynamic gain. This work reports what is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first unified energy, exergy, environmental and exergoenvironmental comparison of two combined sCO2–organic Rankine cycle (ORC) configurations—a simple and a recompression Brayton layout, both with reheating, regeneration and a toluene bottoming ORC—driven by a solar tower and a coconut-shell-biomass furnace. Life-cycle impacts are quantified with Eco-indicator 99, a damage-oriented method that scores construction, operation and decommissioning damage in milli-points (mPts), and are allocated to the exergy streams through the exergoenvironmental balance. Both cycles are modelled in Python with CoolProp properties and validated against published sCO2 analyses (efficiency deviation below 7.3%). The recompression layout reaches 54.3% thermal and 32.0% second-law efficiency and cuts the exergy destruction from 173 to 128 kW. Its larger construction impact (22.6 vs. 20.1 mPts/h) is negligible against the shared biomass reheater (429.4 mPts/h), so it is also marginally cleaner overall (459 vs. 472 mPts/h). Efficiency-oriented layout selection is therefore environmentally safe, and the remaining leverage lies in the biomass supply chain.
Jiménez et al. (Tue,) studied this question.