What does this research mean for the field?

The automated oscillometric home blood pressure monitor AViTA BPM82 demonstrated a mean difference of −1.6 ± 7.4 mmHg systolic and fulfilled AAMI/ESH/ISO standards for home blood pressure monitoring. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.CONFIRMATORY. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.SUPPORTS_CONSENSUS.

What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to assess the accuracy of the AViTA BPM82 automated blood pressure monitor in a general population following established standards.

February 12, 2026

Validation of the automated oscillometric home blood pressure monitor AViTA BPM82 in a general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018)

Key Result

The AViTA BPM82 home BP monitor met AAMI/ESH/ISO 81060-2:2018 standards, showing mean differences −1.6±7.4/−1.5±5.6 mmHg and SDs 6.20/5.11 mmHg for systolic/diastolic.

Key Points

The aim is to assess the accuracy of the AViTA BPM82 automated blood pressure monitor in a general population following established standards.
Participants were selected based on age, sex, blood pressure, and arm circumference criteria.
Arm measurements were taken using a 360° wide-range hard cuff (22-42 cm).
Multiple readings were taken sequentially on the same arm.
The average difference between the test device and reference readings was within acceptable limits.
Systolic and diastolic averages showed a mean difference of -1.6 mmHg and -1.5 mmHg, respectively.
The standard deviation of individual BP differences met the recommended thresholds.

Structured PICO

Does the AViTA BPM82 automated home blood pressure monitor accurately measure blood pressure compared to reference readings in a general population?

Population

85 analyzed individuals from a general population (112 recruited), mean age 58.1 ± 15.2 years, 34 men, arm circumference 32 ± 5.5 cm (range 22-42 cm).

Intervention

Automated upper-arm cuff oscillometric home blood pressure monitor AViTA BPM82 using a single 360° wide-range hard cuff

Comparator

Reference blood pressure readings using the same arm sequential measurement method

Outcome

Accuracy of blood pressure measurement according to AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) Criterion 1 and Criterion 2surrogate

The AViTA BPM82 automated home blood pressure monitor meets AAMI/ESH/ISO accuracy standards and is recommended for home use.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the automated upper-arm cuff oscillometric home blood pressure (BP) monitor AViTA BPM82 in a general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018) and its amendments (1 : 2020 and 2 : 2024). Methods Participants were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, BP, and arm distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018) and its amendments (1 : 2020 and 2 : 2024) in a general population using the same arm sequential measurement method. A single 360° wide-range hard cuff of the test device was used for arm circumference 22–42 cm. Results One-hundred-twelve individuals were recruited and 85 were analyzed mean age 58.1 ± 15.2 (SD) years, 34 men, arm circumference 32 ± 5.5 cm, range: 22–42 cm. For validation of Criterion 1, the mean difference ± SD between the test device and reference BP readings ( N 255) was −1.6 ± 7.4/−1.5 ± 5.6 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold: ≤5 ± 8 mmHg). For Criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences between the test device and reference BP per individual ( N 85) was 6.20/5.11 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold: ≤6.76/6.78 mmHg). Conclusion The automated oscillometric home BP monitor AViTA BPM82 fulfilled all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018) and its amendments (1 : 2020 and 2 : 2024) in a general population and can be recommended for home use.

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Menti et al. (Mon,) reported a other. The AViTA BPM82 home BP monitor met AAMI/ESH/ISO 81060-2:2018 standards, showing mean differences −1.6±7.4/−1.5±5.6 mmHg and SDs 6.20/5.11 mmHg for systolic/diastolic.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6efe5be6419ac0d5502b https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/mbp.0000000000000795

Bookmark