Key result
AViTA BPM82 home BP monitor meets AAMI/ESH/ISO accuracy standards for systolic and diastolic measurements.
Why the study?
The accuracy of the automated upper-arm cuff oscillometric home BP monitor AViTA BPM82 required evaluation according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard.
Does the AViTA BPM82 automated home blood pressure monitor accurately measure blood pressure compared to reference readings in a general population?
Does the AViTA BPM82 automated home blood pressure monitor accurately measure blood pressure compared to reference readings in a general population?
The AViTA BPM82 automated home blood pressure monitor meets AAMI/ESH/ISO accuracy standards and is recommended for home use.
Supports AViTA BPM82 accuracy for home monitoring; extends prior validations but leaves open outcome data before practice change.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the automated upper-arm cuff oscillometric home blood pressure (BP) monitor AViTA BPM82 in a general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018) and its amendments (1 : 2020 and 2 : 2024). Methods Participants were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, BP, and arm distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018) and its amendments (1 : 2020 and 2 : 2024) in a general population using the same arm sequential measurement method. A single 360° wide-range hard cuff of the test device was used for arm circumference 22–42 cm. Results One-hundred-twelve individuals were recruited and 85 were analyzed [mean age 58.1 ± 15.2 (SD) years, 34 men, arm circumference 32 ± 5.5 cm, range: 22–42 cm]. For validation of Criterion 1, the mean difference ± SD between the test device and reference BP readings ( N 255) was −1.6 ± 7.4/−1.5 ± 5.6 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold: ≤5 ± 8 mmHg). For Criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences between the test device and reference BP per individual ( N 85) was 6.20/5.11 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold: ≤6.76/6.78 mmHg). Conclusion The automated oscillometric home BP monitor AViTA BPM82 fulfilled all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018) and its amendments (1 : 2020 and 2 : 2024) in a general population and can be recommended for home use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menti et al. (2026) studied this question. The AViTA BPM82 home BP monitor met AAMI/ESH/ISO 81060-2:2018 standards, showing mean differences −1.6±7.4/−1.5±5.6 mmHg and SDs 6.20/5.11 mmHg for systolic/diastolic.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: